I actually didn't go to most of the presentations on the 2nd and 3rd day... it's nothing against the speakers, but I just usually don't have the attention span after the first day at most conferences, and I came to this one overtired, with the timezone change not helping. I did hear good things from people who did attend the talks, so I'm pleased to see that paper quality was generally good. Ron Fox in the post-conference discussion seemed to confirm this as well.
So mostly I was doing "bilateral meetings" (just finished Stephen Lewis' Massey lectures, which is of course heavily UN oriented, and a very engaging and disturbing read), which was the main reason I went to the conference anyway. Had a chance to sit down with Jean-Claude for several hours, Steve for a while, and Mike Doyle (with Steve and Jean-Claude) to talk about the overall Stargus vision/motivation. I've got a much better sense of all that, and a few concrete things I want to work on or keep an eye on over the short term, which in itself makes the conference worthwhile. Lots of other time spent with various others too.. good to see lots of old faces, and meet a number of new ones.
It's a quirky crowd (no surprise), very bright, and with a good number of successful (if incredibly low key) individuals. Richard Hipp continues to amaze me.
I'm still entertained by the technology problems that would never in a million years be faced by normal humans (who don't spend the day before the presentation putting the latest Linux drivers on their laptop and then wonder why it won't project).
Interesting aside that while overall its not a crowd that you'd describe as the picture of health (like most tech crowds), there were a lot more people who'd started exercise and diet programs and were doing well on them ... not something I thought I'd ever have multiple discussions about at this conference. Very good to see, and kudos to everyone who's taking their health more seriously.
I have to confess to still not being used to (or necessarily comfortable with) the recent technical conference model of lots of laptops, wireless everywhere, and people being less engaged with the speaker than at more "traditional" conferences. I understand the reasons for it, but it's somehow less satisfying to me. Not that I'm against side work and digressions (ok, there's some conferences I've been to I've not gone to a single talk), but I prefer them outside the room that presentations are going on in. On the other hand, it's also interesting having the remote attendees via audiocast, with the chat providing a bit of a backchannel. Primitive compared with what real remote presentation tools are doing today, but interesting nonetheless.
More progress on the "don't try to design the correct solution but just do it" front... Joe English is going to try to ramp things up on the repository needs. Had a chance to listen to him about this at the working session on it, and the solution he's got is incremental and really takes into account the social aspects (the real hard part in my mind), whereas a lot of the others focused more on the technical stuff (a lot of the issues seemed like they'll be entirely workable over time). Hope that catches on.
Also talked today about moving the Tcler's Wiki onto ProjectForum eventually (something we've idled about for the last year), and figured out a reasonable go forward strategy to do that.
Still have many hesitations when it comes to long term things, but given I'm not facing any imminent decisions about projects etc. I don't see a real need to dwell on it. I think given any particular projects that come up in the future, the context will make the choices obvious.
Overall, glad I went this year, more so than I expected.